TL;DR
Get business pricing on office and shipping supplies
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
A Kiplinger advice column considered whether a retired couple with about $10 million in net worth should keep an aggressive investment portfolio. The experts cited the couple’s reported $9,600 in monthly Social Security, pension and annuity income, but said spending needs, portfolio composition, tax planning and comfort with market losses should guide the decision.
A Kiplinger advice column examined whether a retired couple with a reported net worth of about $10 million should keep investing aggressively, with financial professionals pointing to their substantial income and assets while saying the right level of risk depends on spending, investment choices and ability to withstand market declines. The exchange is an individual financial-planning discussion, not a finding that an aggressive strategy suits retirees generally.
The reader, identified by Kiplinger as “Legacy Builder,” said he and his 72-year-old wife receive about $9,600 a month from Social Security, a pension and annuity payments. They reported about $3 million in real estate, including a rental house producing $1,500 a month in net income and carrying an $180,000 mortgage. They also own their primary residence and a vacation home outright.
The couple described an investment portfolio that includes $3.8 million in IRAs, $850,000 in Roth accounts, $900,000 in a Generation-Skipping Trust for which the reader is trustee, and $800,000 in non-tax-deferred accounts. The latter includes $150,000 in cash accounts. The reader said his goal was to invest for heirs because he believed the couple had enough money to avoid worrying about their own finances.
Phillip E. Battin, president and CEO of Ambassador Wealth Management, said the reported income suggests the couple’s needs may be met, reducing concern about having to sell investments after a market decline to cover basic expenses. He also cautioned that rental income is not guaranteed if tenants leave, though he said the couple did not appear dependent on it and could sell the property if necessary. Robert Jeter, a certified financial planner, urged the couple to distinguish an aggressive allocation from speculative investments.
Income and Spending Set the Risk
The case highlights why a portfolio’s risk cannot be judged by age or net worth alone. Retirees who need to sell stocks regularly to pay expenses may be forced to lock in losses during a downturn. The couple’s reported $9,600 monthly income and real estate holdings may give them more flexibility than retirees who rely heavily on portfolio withdrawals, but the source does not provide a full spending picture.
Chris Berkel, president and founder of AXIS Financial, said risk tolerance has two parts: the ability to accept risk and the willingness to do so. A financial plan that compares dependable income with expected spending can help assess the first. The couple’s emotional response to a large decline matters to the second. A high net worth does not by itself establish that they would be comfortable with losses or that their assets are arranged to meet their goals.
The question also matters because the reader’s stated aim is to leave money to heirs. That goal may shape investment and tax choices, but it does not remove the need to fund the couple’s own care, spending and other obligations. The experts’ comments are considerations for this particular scenario, not a personalized recommendation based on a complete review of the couple’s finances.
retirement investment portfolio diversification
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Accounts Have Different Tax Treatment
The portfolio is spread across taxable, tax-deferred and Roth accounts, which can be taxed differently during the owners’ lives and when assets pass to beneficiaries. Jeter suggested that the couple consider where more aggressive and more conservative investments are held, while Battin raised the possibility of investing taxable assets with the potential step-up in cost basis at death. These are expert suggestions in the column, not a guarantee of a particular tax result.
Brandon M. Cox, a certified financial planner and founder of Coastline Complete Wealth, suggested evaluating Roth conversions. He said converting some traditional IRA assets could be worth examining if current tax rates are favorable relative to future rates. The column also noted that a surviving spouse could face different tax brackets and that children who inherit traditional IRAs generally must withdraw the money within 10 years. Whether conversions make sense depends on tax rates, timing, account balances and the couple’s broader plan.
The source material does not say the couple has completed a financial plan, disclose their annual spending, list specific funds or provide a detailed asset allocation. Those missing details limit how confidently anyone can assess the portfolio’s risk.
“I would absolutely be looking at whether it makes sense to start converting some of that IRA money to Roth.”
— Brandon M. Cox, CFP and founder of Coastline Complete Wealth
Spending and Portfolio Details Are Missing
The column does not provide the couple’s annual spending, withdrawal rate, health-care costs, investment allocation by asset class, or the specific funds described as aggressive. Without those details, it is not possible to determine how much of their lifestyle depends on portfolio withdrawals or whether their current holdings are concentrated in particular sectors or risks.
The couple’s income is reported as a combined monthly figure, but the source does not break down the Social Security, pension and annuity amounts or explain how those payments may change over time. It also gives no details about the rental property’s future costs, vacancy risk or sale value. The experts’ comments are conditional and do not establish that the strategy is safe, tax-efficient or appropriate for the couple.
Build the Plan Around Their Spending
The next step described by the experts is to assess the couple’s actual spending goals against dependable income and available assets. A financial plan could test how the portfolio might support expenses during a market decline and whether the couple can avoid selling investments at unfavorable prices. They would also need to decide what level of loss they could tolerate in practice, not only what they can afford on paper.
Any review of their strategy would also need to examine the holdings within each account, the role of the rental property, and the tax consequences of asset location or Roth conversions. The source does not report that the couple has adopted any of these suggestions or say what investment changes, if any, they will make.
Key Questions
What assets and income did the couple report?
The reader reported about $10 million in net worth, including roughly $3 million in real estate, and about $9,600 a month from Social Security, a pension and annuity payments. He also listed balances in IRAs, Roth accounts, a trust and non-tax-deferred accounts.
Did the experts say the couple should stop investing aggressively?
No. Battin said the reported income and assets did not make the stock holdings sound too risky, while warning that aggressive investing need not mean speculative bets. The column did not provide a definitive portfolio recommendation.
Why does the couple’s spending matter?
Spending helps show whether dependable income covers expenses or whether the couple may need to draw from investments. That affects their ability to wait through a market downturn without selling assets to pay bills.
What tax strategies did the advisers raise?
The advisers discussed how investments might be distributed among taxable, tax-deferred and Roth accounts, and whether Roth conversions merit review. The source does not establish that either approach would save this couple money; that depends on their circumstances and tax analysis.
Source: rss
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
