🔍 Read the full analysis: The Break-Even Rate That Helps Set Your IT Hiring Strategy on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get business pricing on office and shipping supplies
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
TL;DR
An analysis published Nov. 6 calculates a U.S. median software developer’s employer cost at about $95 per hour actually worked, rising to about $98 after an assumed one-year hiring cost. It says the key variable is how much of a hire’s time is productively needed: at 50% utilization, the modeled break-even rate is about $197 an hour. The calculation is a framework, not a comparison with specific vendor rates.
Thorsten Meyer published a break-even calculation on Nov. 6 for deciding whether to hire a developer or use staff augmentation, estimating that a median U.S. software developer costs an employer about $95 per hour actually worked before recruiting costs. The report says the comparison depends most on how much of a full-time hire’s available work time the company can use, rather than salary alone.
The estimate starts with U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics figures: a median software developer wage of $135,980 a year in May 2025 and employer-cost data for June 2026. Meyer applies a 1.28 factor for wages and benefits and estimates about 1,830 hours worked annually, producing an employer cost of roughly $175,000 a year, or about $95 per hour worked. This is Meyer’s calculation from the cited figures, not a BLS-published software developer hourly cost.
Meyer adds recruiting expense using SHRM’s 2025 benchmark. The survey reported an average cost per hire of $5,475 for non-executive roles, across roles rather than technology jobs specifically. Assuming the hire stays for one year, Meyer estimates that cost adds about $3 per hour, bringing the model’s break-even rate to approximately $98 an hour. Over a three-year stay, the estimate falls to about $96 per hour.
For Germany, the report cites Destatis data showing an average employer cost of €58.50 per hour worked in the information and communication sector in 2025. That figure covers all jobs in the sector, not developers alone. Meyer does not provide agency rate comparisons, saying published rate surveys with a clear methodology were not available for the analysis.
Infographic 01 · The true cost of a hire
A salary is not the cost
Before you compare a hire with an outside specialist, convert both into the same unit: cost per hour of real work.
What a median US software developer costs the employer per hour actually worked. Our calculation from BLS wage and employer-cost data.
From salary to hourly cost
Calculation, each input published by the BLS
- Median salary, US software developer (May 2025)$135,980
- × 1.28 employer costs on top (benefits, insurance, retirement, payroll taxes)$174,600
- ÷ hours actually worked (2,080 paid, about 12% paid leave)1,830 h
- Cost per hour actually worked≈ $95
Sources: BLS Employer Costs for Employee Compensation, June 2026, Table 4 · BLS median wage, software developers, May 2025 · Destatis, 29 Apr 2026 · Destatis non-wage labour costs · SHRM 2025 benchmarking. Load factor = total compensation ÷ (wages + paid leave) = $78.88 ÷ $61.43. German sector figure covers all jobs in the sector, not only developers.
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
Utilization Sets the Hiring Threshold
The break-even rate is the maximum hourly outside-specialist rate that would match the modeled cost of employing someone directly. A company should compare its actual vendor quote with its own hiring cost and expected workload; the article’s estimates are starting points, not universal rates.
Utilization can change the arithmetic sharply. Meyer says that if a new hire has useful work for only half of available hours, the cost per useful hour doubles. In the model, the break-even rate rises from about $98 to about $197 an hour. That makes short, uncertain or specialist assignments more plausible candidates for augmentation, while steady core work may favor hiring when a person can remain productively occupied.
The decision is not only financial. Meyer also points to retaining organizational knowledge as a reason to keep work in-house. A company may accept a higher direct cost to preserve expertise it cannot afford to lose; conversely, an outside specialist may suit work that is temporary or narrowly defined.
Popular right now
Ninja Crispi 5-in-1 Glass Air Fryer System, Emerald, FN103BF
Breville Bambino Espresso Machine, Brushed Stainless Steel
Ninja CREAMi 7-in-1 Ice Cream Maker, NC301
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How the Cost Model Is Built
The calculation separates three inputs: employer cost per hour actually worked, recruiting costs, and the share of the hire’s time devoted to useful work. Meyer draws the U.S. wage and employer-cost figures from different BLS releases: the wage is for May 2025, while employer-cost data is for June 2026. The resulting $95 figure is therefore a modeled estimate using those published inputs, not a direct survey measurement for one software developer.
The U.S. employer-cost example for management, professional and related occupations is $78.88 per hour worked, including $54.06 in wages. Meyer compares that with wages plus paid leave to derive a roughly 28% additional-cost factor. For Germany, Destatis reported €29 in non-wage labor costs per €100 of gross earnings in 2025. Its €58.50 information-and-communication figure is a sector average and includes holiday pay and employer social contributions, so the U.S. and German measures are not identical occupational comparisons.
The source says SHRM’s average hiring-cost figure covers advertising, job boards, referral bonuses, travel, relocation and recruiter pay. SHRM’s reported median was $1,200, substantially below its $5,475 average; Meyer uses the average in the one-year example. The analysis does not include a specific company’s onboarding, equipment, management time or other possible costs.
“The assumption that matters most is how much of that time you really need.”
— Thorsten Meyer, in the Nov. 6 article
Inputs That Vary by Employer
The estimates do not establish whether staff augmentation is cheaper for any particular employer. The source provides no provider rates, and individual quotes, benefits, compensation, hiring costs and project needs vary. The model also assumes a one-year or three-year employment period and uses broad occupation or sector data for some inputs.
The article says evidence on how much coding agents increase developer productivity remains unsettled. It does not quantify an AI productivity effect or adjust the break-even figures for one. The precise cost of unused time, onboarding and knowledge loss will also depend on each organization and is not established by the published averages.
Apply the Model to Actual Quotes
The next step for a company is to calculate its own fully loaded employee cost, estimate the hours of productive work required, and compare that result with current specialist quotes. The source offers a repeatable framework but does not name a universal rate or recommend a particular provider.
Any future comparison involving AI should use measured productivity and project-specific costs rather than assume that coding tools make developers faster by a fixed amount. The source gives no timetable for additional data or a follow-up analysis, so the effect of AI on the break-even rate remains open.
Key Questions
What does the break-even rate mean?
It is the highest hourly outside-specialist rate that matches the modeled cost of hiring directly, after accounting for the assumptions used in the calculation.
How much does the report estimate a U.S. developer costs?
Meyer’s calculation puts a median U.S. software developer at about $95 per hour worked before recruiting costs, or about $98 after adding an assumed one-year share of average hiring costs.
Why does utilization change the result?
If an employee has less useful work, the employer’s cost is spread across fewer productive hours. In Meyer’s example, 50% utilization raises the modeled break-even rate from about $98 to about $197 per useful hour.
Does the calculation prove staff augmentation is cheaper?
No. The article provides no vendor rates and does not establish a result for every employer. Companies need to compare their own costs, workload and provider quotes.
Does the report account for AI productivity gains?
No quantified AI productivity adjustment is included. Meyer says evidence about how much coding agents speed up developers remains unsettled, and the article does not estimate a specific effect.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
