Why Wall Street Applauded Microsoft And Took A Harder View Of Alphabet
AIThis post was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).

🔍 Read the full analysis: Why Wall Street Applauded Microsoft And Took A Harder View Of Alphabet on ThorstenMeyerAI.com

Buying for a business?Offer from Amazon

Get business pricing on office and shipping supplies

  • Business-only prices and quantity discounts
  • Tax-exempt purchasing
  • Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

TL;DR

Microsoft shares rose about 4% in after-hours trading after its October 28 results, while Alphabet shares fell about 10%. Alphabet reported faster Google Cloud growth, but Microsoft beat key forecasts and generated positive free cash flow; Alphabet reported negative free cash flow and missed analyst expectations for revenue, earnings per share and search advertising.

Microsoft shares rose about 4% and Alphabet shares fell about 10% in after-hours trading Wednesday, after both companies reported quarterly results and outlined the costs of expanding AI and cloud capacity. Alphabet’s Google Cloud grew faster, but investors also weighed Microsoft’s earnings beat and $18.6 billion in free cash flow against Alphabet’s misses and $9.1 billion in negative free cash flow.

The companies’ cloud growth rates moved in opposite directions from their share reactions. Microsoft reported Azure revenue of $33.2 billion, up 48%, while Alphabet reported Google Cloud revenue of $30.7 billion, up 103%. Microsoft said Azure growth exceeded the 45% rate it had forecast in July. The growth figures alone did not capture the different earnings and cash-flow results investors assessed.

Microsoft reported quarterly revenue of $92.3 billion, up 19%, and adjusted earnings per share of $4.89, compared with the $4.73 expected by analysts polled by LSEG, according to CNBC. Alphabet missed analyst forecasts for revenue, earnings per share and search advertising, according to the source article, which cited CNBC. The source described this as Alphabet’s first combined revenue and profit miss in nearly four years.

Microsoft’s free cash flow was $18.6 billion; Alphabet reported negative $9.1 billion, its second consecutive negative quarter, according to the source. The companies also disclosed very large investment plans. Microsoft’s 2026 capital-spending plan was about $170 billion, compared with about $175 billion in July. Alphabet’s was $195 billion to $205 billion, unchanged from its previous outlook, with a large increase expected in 2027. The source said Alphabet raised $28.7 billion in bonds and $12.4 billion by issuing shares during the quarter and did not buy back shares.

At a glance
analysisWhen: Results reported October 28, 2026; shar…
The developmentAfter the two companies reported results on October 28, investors rewarded Microsoft and sold Alphabet, focusing on earnings performance and the cash costs of AI expansion.
Thorsten Meyer AI
Results · 28 Oct 2026

Infographic 01 · The scorecard

Same night, opposite verdicts.

The four numbers from my 28 October preview, scored with both companies’ own reports for July to September 2026.

+48%Azure revenue, July–September, to $33.2 billion
+103%Google Cloud revenue, July–September, to $30.7 billion
+$18.6BMicrosoft free cash flow after investments
−$9.1BAlphabet free cash flow after investments

The four numbers I said to watch, scored

Status chips: ok = healthy, hold = watch, urgent = warning sign. My assessment.

MetricMicrosoftAlphabet
1 · Capex guidanceMicrosoft hold
About $170B for calendar 2026 (July: about $175B), lower only because deliveries slipped. More than $50B next quarter.
Alphabet hold
$195–205B for 2026, unchanged. 2027 to “increase significantly”; no number yet.
2 · Cloud growth vs. capexMicrosoft hold
Azure +48%. Capex incl. finance leases +30%; cash capex about 2×.
Alphabet hold
Google Cloud +103%. Capex +114% to $51.4B.
3 · Free cash flow + fundingMicrosoft ok
+$18.6B (−27%). No new bonds. $10.2B returned to shareholders.
Alphabet urgent
−$9.1B. $28.7B bonds and $12.4B new shares in the quarter. No buybacks.
4 · CapacityMicrosoft hold
“Demand continues to exceed available supply.” Delayed GPU capacity moves to the first half of 2027.
Alphabet hold
“Supply constrained.” Renting third-party capacity; margin pressure ahead.

Microsoft

≈ +4%

After-hours, 28 Oct (CNBC; Reuters: more than 5%)

  • Beat on revenue ($92.3B, +19%) and earnings per share ($4.89 adjusted vs. $4.73 expected)
  • Azure guide 49–50% for the current quarter
  • Self-funded build-out

Alphabet

≈ −10%

After-hours, 28 Oct (CNBC, Reuters)

  • Missed on revenue ($127.6B vs. $128.2B expected) and earnings ($2.67 adjusted vs. $3.02)
  • Search +12%, below forecasts; AI Mode earns less per query so far
  • Build-out now partly financed with bonds and new shares

Sources: Microsoft FY27 Q1 release and call, 28 Oct 2026; Alphabet Q3 2026 release (8-K), 28 Oct 2026; Alphabet Q3 call, third-party transcript; CNBC on Microsoft, 28 Oct; CNBC on Alphabet, 28 Oct; Reuters, 28 Oct. Analyst expectations as reported by CNBC and Reuters (LSEG, StreetAccount). Capex growth for Alphabet and Microsoft’s cash capex: my arithmetic from the cash flow statements. Status chips: Thorsten Meyer.
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI

Cash Flow Shapes the AI Spending Bet

The market response points to investor concern not only about how quickly cloud revenue is growing, but also about the cash available to fund the infrastructure behind it. Microsoft generated positive free cash flow after its investments, while Alphabet’s cash flow was negative as it expanded capacity. That contrast can affect how investors judge the risks of continuing to spend at scale.

It does not establish which company will ultimately get the greater return from AI. A quarter’s free cash flow is a measure of cash generated after investment, not a verdict on the future value of that investment. The share-price moves show that investors reacted to the results and outlook available that evening; they do not prove that faster cloud growth will be less valuable over time.

Both companies said demand for computing capacity exceeds supply. That matters because it can limit how quickly they turn customer commitments into recognized revenue. Microsoft reported $677 billion in commercial remaining performance obligations, while Google Cloud had $561 billion in customer commitments, according to the source. These are future contractual amounts, not cash already received: Microsoft said only about 30% of its backlog was expected to become revenue within 12 months.

KitchenAid Artisan 5-Quart Tilt-Head Stand Mixer, Almond Cream

KitchenAid Artisan 5-Quart Tilt-Head Stand Mixer, Almond Cream

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Cloud Growth, Spending and Supply

The comparison comes as both companies invest heavily in data centers and processors to serve cloud and AI workloads. Microsoft’s capital spending can be presented in more than one way: it reported $45.2 billion including finance leases and $39.4 billion in cash paid for property and equipment. The cash figure was twice the $19.4 billion recorded a year earlier, according to the source article. Microsoft’s spending was below the $50.7 billion analysts expected, a figure attributed to StreetAccount via CNBC.

Microsoft Chief Financial Officer Amy Hood said some third-party capacity deliveries expected in the quarter were delayed. She also said spending would exceed $50 billion in the current quarter and accelerate in the first half of 2027. Alphabet’s spending plan remained at $195 billion to $205 billion for 2026; the source said the company had started renting capacity from third parties as it faced supply constraints. These reported plans and comments suggest that current-period spending may not capture all costs due as construction and deliveries proceed.

Microsoft’s results were not uniformly strong. The source reported that revenue from PC makers fell 27%, amid weaker PC demand and a comparison with the prior year’s Windows 10 deadline. It also reported $10 billion in Microsoft revenue from OpenAI during the quarter, including revenue-sharing payments. Those figures add detail to a quarter in which the company’s cloud growth and earnings beat were central to the positive market reaction.

Delivery Delays and Returns Remain Open

The results do not show how quickly either company will convert its customer commitments into revenue or whether future AI-related income will justify the scale of investment. Backlog totals cover commitments over time, and Microsoft’s disclosed estimate places only about 30% of its commercial obligations within the next 12 months.

Near-term spending is also subject to timing. Microsoft said some expected capacity deliveries were delayed and described plans for higher spending in coming quarters. Alphabet said demand was constrained and was renting outside capacity, but the supplied material does not quantify how much that arrangement costs or how long it will continue. The source provides no detailed breakdown establishing how much of either company’s negative or positive cash-flow result will persist.

The after-hours share moves are an immediate market reaction, not a settled assessment of long-term performance. The supplied material also does not provide the exact share-price close in the following regular session or subsequent analyst revisions.

Next Quarter Tests Spending Plans

Investors will look for Microsoft’s next results to show whether spending rises above the $50 billion level Hood forecast for the current quarter and whether delayed capacity arrives on schedule. The company has said investment should accelerate in the first half of 2027, making delivery timing and its effect on cash flow key points to monitor.

For Alphabet, upcoming results will show whether its high investment plan is accompanied by sustained cloud growth and improved cash generation, and whether search advertising returns to analyst expectations. Both companies will also need to demonstrate how supply constraints affect their ability to serve customers. The source material does not give a date for their next earnings reports, so the timing of those updates is not specified here.

Key Questions

Why did Microsoft shares rise while Alphabet shares fell?

After the companies reported results on October 28, Microsoft beat analyst expectations for revenue and adjusted earnings per share, while Alphabet missed forecasts for revenue, earnings per share and search advertising. Microsoft also reported positive free cash flow, while Alphabet reported negative free cash flow. These factors offer context for the different after-hours reactions, but do not prove what drove every investor’s decision.

Did Alphabet’s cloud business grow faster than Azure?

Yes, according to the reported quarterly figures: Google Cloud revenue grew 103% to $30.7 billion, while Azure revenue grew 48% to $33.2 billion. Faster growth did not prevent Alphabet shares from falling after the results, as investors also assessed earnings, advertising and cash flow.

How did the companies’ free cash flow compare?

Microsoft reported $18.6 billion in free cash flow. Alphabet reported negative $9.1 billion, its second negative quarter in a row, according to the source material. These are quarterly results, not guarantees of future cash flow.

Do the cloud backlog figures represent cash already collected?

No. The figures are customer commitments for future service, not cash already received. Microsoft reported $677 billion in commercial remaining performance obligations and said about 30% was expected to become revenue within 12 months; Google Cloud’s customer commitments were reported at $561 billion.

What remains uncertain about the AI investment plans?

The timing of capacity deliveries, the pace at which commitments turn into revenue, and the eventual returns on the spending remain unclear. Microsoft described delayed deliveries and forecast higher spending, while Alphabet said it was renting capacity as supply remained constrained. The supplied material does not establish whether these conditions will persist or how much return the investments will generate.

Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com

This content is for general information only and is not financial, tax or legal advice. Consult a qualified professional for decisions about your money.
You May Also Like

4K Gaming Monitors Sound Great—Until Refresh Rate Enters the Chat

Narrowing down the perfect 4K gaming monitor requires understanding why refresh rate matters and how it impacts your gameplay experience.

Vector Windows Accelerates FlexScreen Production With High-Speed FS-HS Manufacturing Line

Vector Windows has announced the launch of its high-speed FS-HS manufacturing line, significantly accelerating FlexScreen production capacity.

AGI Adjacency Problem

The AGI adjacency problem highlights infrastructure constraints—chips, energy, supply chains—that determine AI deployment at scale, not just model capabilities.

Refresh Rate vs Resolution: Stop Chasing the Wrong Spec

The truth about refresh rate and resolution reveals why focusing solely on one can hinder your perfect display setup—continue reading to find out how to optimize your choice.