🔍 Read the full analysis: Indonesia’s AI Bill And The Copyright Concerns Facing Tech Platforms on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get business pricing on office and shipping supplies
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
TL;DR
Google, Meta and TikTok raised objections to Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law revision at a parliamentary hearing on Nov. 11, 2026. The draft addresses payments for news displayed by platforms and copyright rules for AI, but its current text is not publicly available and it has not become law.
Google, Meta and TikTok challenged parts of Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law revision at a parliamentary hearing in Jakarta on Nov. 11, arguing over proposed payments for news content and rules governing artificial intelligence. The bill remains under deliberation, and its current text has not been made available for review.
The proposal would revise Indonesia’s Copyright Law, Law No. 28 of 2014. Parliament approved it as an initiative in a plenary session on March 12, 2026, and its Legislation Body, known as Baleg, is now discussing it with the government. The Nov. 11 hearing included representatives of Google, Meta and TikTok, as well as the Press Council and Satu Lisensi Indonesia, Kompas reported.
The companies object to different parts of the proposal. Google opposes payment requirements for links and news snippets, mandatory licensing through one collective body, and a licensing requirement for all AI training data. It has proposed a text-and-data-mining exception with an opt-out, such as a robots.txt instruction. Meta argued that sharing a link is not the same as republishing an article and said payment obligations could reduce publishers’ traffic and revenue. TikTok said AI disclosure should not be required when AI is used only to assist a creator, and called for platforms to retain safe-harbor protections.
The draft described by Reuters in July would require platforms to compensate news publishers for aggregation, republication and link previews, as well as use of news content for AI training. Payments would pass through state-supervised collective management organisations. It also proposed rules on AI-generated and AI-assisted works, imitation of creators’ distinctive styles, disclosure of AI use and the use of copyrighted works to train models. The July version is not necessarily the text now before lawmakers.
Indonesia’s AI bill and platform concerns
Google, Meta and TikTok challenged parts of a proposed copyright-law revision at a parliamentary hearing. The bill remains under discussion, and its current text is not publicly available.
What platforms challenged
Their objections cover proposed payments for news and rules for AI use.
Payments and licensing
Opposes payments for links and snippets, one mandatory licensing body, and licensing all AI training data.
Links are not republication
Says payment obligations could reduce publishers’ traffic and revenue.
Creator assistance
Says disclosure should not be required when AI only assists a creator and called for safe-harbor protections.
What the earlier draft described
A July version reported by Reuters outlined possible changes; it may differ from the text now under discussion.
Platforms could pay publishers for aggregation, republication, link previews, and news used to train AI.
Proposed rules covered AI-assisted works, creator-style imitation, AI-use disclosure, and copyrighted training material.
Payments would pass through state-supervised collective management organisations.
Why the outcome matters
The rules could affect how news reaches readers and how publishers, creators, and technology companies manage rights.
- Link and preview payments could change how platforms display news.
- Publisher compensation and referral traffic are central concerns.
- AI training, licensing, and disclosure rules could shape service costs and creator protections.
- Final effects depend on the bill’s wording and how rules are applied.
What happens next
Baleg is continuing deliberations with the government after hearing from technology companies, the Press Council, and a licensing organisation.
How News Payments Could Change
The debate could affect how Indonesians find news online and how publishers are paid when their work appears on digital platforms. Under the proposal described in July, even aggregation and link previews could trigger compensation. Google’s representative said at the hearing that a levy on links could leave the company with “no choice” but to stop crawling, indexing and distributing Indonesian news, Reuters reported. That is Google’s position, not an announced change to its services.
The dispute also touches the economics of publishing. At the hearing, the Press Council said platforms account for 80% of digital advertising and that traffic from platforms to news websites has fallen by up to 70%, according to reports. Those figures were presented by the council; the materials provided do not give a measurement period or comparison baseline. The proposed AI provisions could also shape whether developers can train models on copyrighted work and what creators must disclose when AI contributes to a work.
For platforms, the outcome matters because rules could affect the cost and legal conditions of operating search, social-media and AI services in Indonesia. For publishers and creators, the central questions are whether the bill creates new routes to compensation and how rights can be licensed or protected. The effects will depend on the final wording and how any rules are applied.
Popular right now
Samsung 43-Inch M70H Series 4K Mini LED Smart TV (2026)
Apple AirPods Pro 3 Wireless Earbuds with Active Noise Cancellation
De'Longhi Classic Signature Espresso Machine with Adjustable Milk Frother
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From 2014 Copyright Law to AI Rules
The revision is being considered against an existing policy framework. Presidential Regulation No. 32 of 2024 requires digital platforms to support quality journalism. Dewan Pers deputy chair Totok Suryanto told lawmakers that the regulation had not worked as intended and that platform compliance was low, according to Aktual.
Reuters reported the proposed AI provisions on July 17, citing a draft and a law ministry official who confirmed that version was authentic. The July text would protect AI-assisted works only if they met human-involvement criteria, while excluding fully AI-generated works. It did not specify how much human contribution would qualify. The draft also proposed that using copyrighted works to train AI models be governed by fair-use provisions or licensing agreements, and included sanctions that could extend to revoking local business permits.
At the November hearing, Google cited Articles 29 and 30 as requiring payments for indexing, aggregation, curation and displaying news snippets, according to Suara. Because the current draft could not be obtained and reports refer to different versions, those article numbers and details should be treated as provisional.
“A levy on links would leave Google with “no choice” but to stop crawling, indexing and distributing Indonesian news.”
— Google representative Agung Pamungkas, as reported by Reuters
Draft Text and Impact Remain Open
The text currently under discussion is not available in the source material, and the draft has changed since the July version reported by Reuters. Reports cite different versions, so the final scope of payment duties, AI rules, licensing arrangements and sanctions cannot yet be confirmed. The proposal is still being discussed and has not become law.
It is also unclear how lawmakers would define sufficient human involvement in AI-assisted work, how a ban on imitating a creator’s style would be applied, and whether AI training would be covered by licensing, a fair-use rule or another approach. The available reporting does not establish whether platforms would actually stop indexing Indonesian news if a payment requirement is adopted.
No vote date was identified in the source material. The Press Council’s figures on advertising and referral traffic were presented at the hearing, but their measurement windows and comparison bases were not provided.
Parliamentary Deliberations Continue
Baleg is continuing to deliberate on the bill with the government after hearing from technology companies, the Press Council and a licensing organisation. The next key development will be publication or clarification of the text lawmakers are considering, followed by any further hearings, revisions or scheduling of a vote. No vote date has been announced in the available reporting.
Until lawmakers settle the text and the proposal advances through parliament, the July provisions remain an account of an earlier draft rather than final legal requirements. Readers should watch for a revised bill and official statements identifying how the provisions on news compensation, AI training, disclosure and platform liability have changed.
Key Questions
Has Indonesia passed the AI copyright bill?
No. The proposal is still under parliamentary deliberation; the available reporting does not identify an enacted law or a vote date.
What did Google, Meta and TikTok object to?
Google challenged payments for links and snippets, mandatory collective licensing and licensing all AI training data. Meta said links are not republication and warned payment rules could affect publisher traffic and revenue. TikTok said disclosure should not be required when AI only assists a creator and called for safe-harbor protections.
Would platforms have to pay Indonesian publishers for links?
The July draft described by Reuters proposed compensation for activities including aggregation, republication and link previews. The current text has not been obtained, so the final payment requirements are not confirmed.
What AI rules did the earlier draft propose?
The July version proposed rules on AI disclosure, protection for qualifying AI-assisted works, imitation of distinctive creator styles and use of copyrighted material for training. It excluded fully AI-generated works from copyright protection, but did not define the human contribution required for an AI-assisted work.
When will lawmakers vote on the bill?
No vote date was announced in the source material. Baleg is discussing the proposal with the government, and the draft may still change.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
