TL;DR
Get business pricing on office and shipping supplies
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
A Kiplinger contributing adviser describes booking a last-minute trip to Seattle for a U.S. World Cup match after his wife urged him to prioritize the experience over the cost. He argues that once people have financial security, spending on shared experiences can create lasting memories, while acknowledging that his account is personal rather than evidence of a universal financial rule.
A Kiplinger contributing adviser says he booked a last-minute trip to Seattle for a U.S. World Cup match after his wife told him, “Memories over money — just do it.” In a personal essay, the president of Exit 59 Advisory argues that spending on experiences can bring value beyond financial security, while stressing that clients should have financial plans that account for such expenses.
The adviser says he had considered attending the match after the U.S. team qualified for the round of 32 but hesitated over the cost and logistics. The night before the game, he booked a flight, one hotel night and a ticket. The U.S. played Belgium in Seattle, and the result disappointed him, but he says he had no regrets about going. The article does not give the trip’s total cost.
His argument is not that people should set financial security aside. He describes money as the base that supports security and says it remains necessary for retirement happiness. His narrower point is that, once people have reached an adequate level of security, money can also provide freedom, time and experiences. He says his advisory clients have financial plans with expense lines for experiences.
The contributor also draws on family travel and regular gatherings. He says his children, now ages 8, 4 and 1, have recalled details from trips, including a bunny they saw on a farm in Austria and seeing the Statue of Liberty in New York. His extended family, he writes, has gathered for Sunday dinners almost every weekend since 2011. Those examples support his view that memories can come from costly travel or ordinary time spent together.
Planning Beyond the Account Balance
The essay addresses a practical question for people saving for retirement: what is money meant to make possible once essential needs are covered? The adviser’s answer is to include experiences in financial planning, rather than treating every discretionary expense as a failure to save. This is a personal perspective, not a calculation showing that a particular trip or purchase produces a financial return.
For readers, the distinction is between financial security and spending without a plan. The writer explicitly says he is not dismissing security and describes client plans that include experience-related costs. His account may prompt households to discuss which shared activities matter to them, while the article does not prescribe an amount to spend or establish that travel is suitable for every budget.
The account also broadens “experiences” beyond vacations. A meal, a walk or a recurring family gathering may create shared memories without the cost of a major trip. The adviser says experiences can be rewarding through anticipation, participation and later recollection, though that framing is his interpretation rather than a quantified finding presented in the report.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Family Trips and the Seattle Match
The Kiplinger piece is written by a contributing adviser and presents the author’s own views; the source notes that it is not the position of Kiplinger’s editorial staff. It recounts a decision made shortly before the match, after the author had delayed acting on the idea. His wife’s comment became the essay’s organizing principle: a reminder to weigh meaningful experiences alongside the money they cost.
The adviser uses stories from family life to explain why he values experiences. He says people had told him that young children would not remember trips, but he describes his daughter Vivian recalling an animal from a visit to Austria and Lucy referring to New York and the Statue of Liberty. He also recalls a transatlantic flight on which his daughter became sick, saying that the family can laugh about the episode three years later.
He links these examples to a sketch by fellow financial planner Carl Richards, a former New York Times personal finance columnist. As described in the essay, Richards’s diagram overlaps “experiences” and “people you love,” with an arrow pointing to the overlap and the words “spend money here.” The author uses that idea to frame spending around shared experiences, rather than material purchases alone.
““Memories over money — just do it.””
— The contributor’s wife, as quoted in the Kiplinger essay
The Cost and Evidence Behind the Claim
The article does not disclose how much the Seattle trip cost, how it fit into the adviser’s household budget or what financial trade-offs he made. It also does not provide research details or data to support a general comparison between spending on experiences and spending on material goods. The claim that people who turn financial resources into memories tend to be happier is the author’s professional observation, not a quantified result established in the piece.
The account is personal and does not show that the same spending choice would be appropriate for someone without adequate savings, with debt or with other financial priorities. The source material also does not specify the article’s publication date. The exact match date and broader tournament details are not needed to understand the essay’s argument and are not established here beyond the author’s account.
Applying the Idea to Personal Plans
The essay sets out no formal next step, policy change or new financial product. Its practical suggestion is to make room in a financial plan for experiences a household values, after accounting for its security needs. Readers considering that approach can compare discretionary spending with their own income, savings goals and obligations rather than treating the author’s one-off trip as a spending rule.
The adviser’s account ends with the same principle that prompted the booking: “Memories over money.” Whether that principle fits another household depends on its circumstances. The article leaves readers with a question of priorities, not a specific spending target or a promise that paying for an experience will make someone happier.
Key Questions
What is the Kiplinger contributor arguing?
He argues that people should consider using some money for experiences and shared memories once their financial security needs are addressed. He does not argue that people should ignore budgeting or savings.
What prompted the Seattle trip?
The adviser says he had been considering the U.S. World Cup match but kept making excuses. His wife urged him to go the day before the game, and he booked a flight, one hotel night and a ticket.
Did he regret attending after the U.S. lost?
No. He writes that the result did not go his way but says he had no regrets about going. The article does not report the trip’s cost.
Does the article say everyone should spend more on travel?
No. The author discusses travel as one kind of experience, alongside meals, walks and family gatherings. He also says financial security matters and does not set a recommended spending amount.
What remains unknown about the trip?
The article does not state the total cost, how the trip fit into the author’s budget or whether it required trade-offs with other financial goals. It presents his personal experience rather than a cost-benefit analysis.
Source: rss
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
